Making AI an ally in a fast changing workplace

Making AI an ally in a fast changing workplace

Making AI an ally in a fast changing workplace
Shutterstock illustration image
Short Url

For decades, software was centered around data. Initially, this meant digitizing mountains of paper records, storing them in databases, and retrieving them more efficiently. Tasks that once required sifting through file cabinets, mainframes, or early enterprise systems were then streamlined by technology.

Still, the bulk of real work — whether in a travel agency, a human resources department, or a hospital — continued to be handled by humans. These early digital tools functioned as advanced filing cabinets, saving space and time, but still relied on people to interpret and act on the data they contained.

Then came the cloud era. Large servers maintained offsite replaced the need for clunky hardware in office basements, making information more accessible and less expensive to manage. Yet, this convenience did not dramatically reduce the need for human labor. Even with cloud-based software, professionals continued to handle everything from customer support queries to accounts receivable.

The digital platforms served mainly as centralized repositories; employees were still opening emails, typing responses, making phone calls, and moving information from one system to another. In short, software stored data more efficiently, but it did not fundamentally alter the fact that people were doing the heavy lifting of day-to-day operations.

That is changing. The wave we are witnessing now goes beyond merely adding features or improving convenience. Artificial intelligence is evolving from a tool that primarily organizes and processes data into one that performs tasks traditionally handled by people.

Just a few years ago, the idea of an AI system managing legal paperwork, responding to support emails, tracking payment schedules, or scheduling appointments in multiple languages might have sounded far-fetched. Yet, these capabilities already exist in prototype or limited-release forms, and many organizations find them particularly appealing because AI effectively fills labor gaps.

The difference this time is both economic and practical on a large scale. In the past, software accounted for only a small percentage of most companies’ budgets — a helpful tool to boost employee productivity. Meanwhile, labor costs, benefits, and training far outweighed expenses for databases or office software. When an organization grew, it needed to hire more staff to handle the increased workload.

AI is changing the equation. Instead of only one person answering a number of calls or emails daily, AI can operate around the clock at a fraction of the cost. This shift makes previously unthinkable applications of software not only possible but highly appealing from a business perspective.

This is especially evident in customer support and communication roles. Early chatbots were often clumsy and had frustrating interfaces, only handling the simplest queries. In contrast, new-generation models — trained on massive datasets — can now generate coherent, context-aware responses in real-time.

Instead of functioning as bare-bones frequently-asked-questions systems, these AI agents can learn the nuances of a company’s product line, reference past customer interactions, and adapt their tone to suit different audiences. In many cases, they handle the bulk of mundane interactions independently. Humans now step in only for exceptions or complex issues, effectively becoming “managers” of AI rather than the frontline agents.

The real opportunity lies in combining AI’s labor capabilities with human empathy and insight.

Mohammed A. Al-Qarni

This shift from data to labor extends well beyond customer service. In healthcare, AI can process standard patient forms, allowing nurses and administrative staff to focus more on bedside care. In finance, AI can chase overdue invoices, notify individuals who fall behind on payments, and even negotiate payment plans. In compliance, AI-driven systems can flag suspicious transactions and prepare preliminary reports for human review. In countless other fields, such as insurance underwriting, market research, and creative brainstorming, AI is taking on core responsibilities that were once handled by entire teams.

Naturally, this raises significant questions about employment and skills. If software replaces much of operational work, what happens to those roles?

The history of technological change shows that while some jobs are lost, new opportunities often emerge in areas where technology falls short. When software digitized record-keeping, it didn’t eliminate HR departments; instead, it made them leaner and shifted staff responsibilities from managing paper forms to more strategic, human-centered tasks.

AI promises a similar reallocation. Tasks requiring complex problem-solving, genuine empathy, relationship-building, or physical presence and advanced judgment will remain within human expertise. However, it would be naive to assume this transition will be painless or that new roles will naturally appear for everyone. Success will require active planning, reskilling, and a willingness to redefine roles within organizations.

What sets this wave apart — and makes it potentially more disruptive — is the sheer depth and range of tasks AI can now perform. It is no longer confined to predictable, mechanical processes.

Modern AI systems can analyze nuanced language, generate personalized content, and adapt to new information in real time. This makes them more than just a time-saving device; they become the backbone of operations where speed, consistency, and scale are paramount. Such capability compels organizations to weigh whether to pay people for tasks that AI can handle faster and at lower cost.

At the same time, it is crucial to remember that humans possess inventive, relational, and interpretive qualities that AI cannot replicate. No model — however advanced — can fully capture the warmth of genuine human interaction or the creativity born from lived experience and social context. The real opportunity lies in combining AI’s labor capabilities with human empathy and insight. Freed from repetitive duties, employees can dedicate more energy to strategic thinking, customer relationships, and, ultimately, innovation.

Software was once focused solely on managing data, not on performing the labor behind it. AI has changed that. Tasks once handled by staff, from administrative duties to client follow-ups, can now be managed by intelligent systems at scale. Companies that embrace this shift thoughtfully and responsibly are likely to outpace those that hold onto legacy models. This is not just another upgrade or a feature set; this is a fundamental rethinking of how work itself is accomplished.

Embracing this transition requires building the right frameworks, safeguards, and strategies to make AI an ally, not a threat — transforming what was once a tool for data into a powerful partner in getting things done.

Mohammed A. Al-Qarni is an academic and consultant on AI for business.
 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Nottingham Forest reach FA Cup quarterfinals after Sels stops Ipswich in shootout

Nottingham Forest reach FA Cup quarterfinals after Sels stops Ipswich in shootout
Updated 25 min 50 sec ago
Follow

Nottingham Forest reach FA Cup quarterfinals after Sels stops Ipswich in shootout

Nottingham Forest reach FA Cup quarterfinals after Sels stops Ipswich in shootout
  • The shootout followed a gripping game at City Ground that was tighter than the teams’ Premier League positions suggested
  • The home side has been the league’s surprise package and sits third on the table, above Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester United

NOTTINGHAM, England: Goalkeeper Matz Sels was the hero for Nottingham Forest as he saved the last penalty in a shootout to take his team past Ipswich Town and into the quarterfinals of the FA Cup on Monday.

The teams were tied 1-1 after 90 minutes and extra time and the first nine takers all converted their penalties in a nail-biting finale.

Then Sels dived to his left to stop Jack Taylor’s kick and guarantee Forest a last-eight tie at Brighton.

The shootout followed a gripping game at City Ground that was tighter than the teams’ Premier League positions suggested.

The home side has been the league’s surprise package and sits third on the table, above Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester United.

But it was Ipswich, third-to-last in the league, that took the lead eight minutes into the second half when George Hirst converted a back post header.

Forest got back on level terms when Ryan Yates met Anthony Elanga’s inviting cross from the right and headed home.

Yates had a second goal disallowed just minutes later, and Callum Hudson-Odoi hit the bar with a long-range effort seven minutes from time. Although both sides pushed forward for a winner, especially in the end-to-end half hour of extra time, it went to penalties.

“It was the only penalty I was in the right corner (for)!” Sels said. “In penalties, one of the goalkeepers is going to be the hero. I am happy. Looking forward to the weekend now.”


Russia ‘categorically’ against deploying European troops to Ukraine, Russian senior diplomat says

Russia ‘categorically’ against deploying European troops to Ukraine, Russian senior diplomat says
Updated 59 min 32 sec ago
Follow

Russia ‘categorically’ against deploying European troops to Ukraine, Russian senior diplomat says

Russia ‘categorically’ against deploying European troops to Ukraine, Russian senior diplomat says
  • “Firstly, the European Union is not impartial, and peacekeepers must be impartial,” Ulyanov said on the Telegram messaging app

MOSCOW: Russia is categorically against the idea of potential deployment of European troops to Ukraine, Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s envoy in Vienna to international organizations said on Tuesday.
“Firstly, the European Union is not impartial, and peacekeepers must be impartial,” Ulyanov said on the Telegram messaging app.
“Secondly, Russia is categorically against it.”
 

 


Saudi crown prince, Lebanese president hold meeting in Riyadh

Saudi crown prince, Lebanese president hold meeting in Riyadh
Updated 10 min 34 sec ago
Follow

Saudi crown prince, Lebanese president hold meeting in Riyadh

Saudi crown prince, Lebanese president hold meeting in Riyadh

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman received Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun on Monday.

The pair held a meeting where they discussed the latest developments in Lebanon and the region, in addition to ways of enhancing bilateral relations.

An official reception ceremony was held at Al-Yamamah Palace in Riyadh for Aoun, who is making his first visit to the Kingdom as Lebanon's head of state.

Senior Saudi and Lebanese officials attended the meeting.

Earlier, Aoun said that his visit to Saudi Arabia represents an opportunity to reaffirm the depth of relations between the two nations.

He expressed appreciation for the Kingdom’s role in supporting Lebanon’s stability, safety, and the functioning of its institutions, as well as the various forms of assistance provided by Riyadh.

The president and his delegation are scheduled to travel to Cairo on Tuesday to participate in the extraordinary Arab summit.

Aoun, Lebanon’s former army chief, was elected as the country’s 14th president in January, ending a more than two-year power vacuum.

The Lebanese people hope the new president can tackle the country’s economic crisis, and the devastating aftermath of Hezbollah’s 14-month war with Israel, which left vast areas of Lebanon in ruins and killed more than 4,000.


White House seeks plan for possible Russia sanctions relief, sources say

White House seeks plan for possible Russia sanctions relief, sources say
Updated 04 March 2025
Follow

White House seeks plan for possible Russia sanctions relief, sources say

White House seeks plan for possible Russia sanctions relief, sources say
  • Russia is one of the world’s biggest oil producers and if US sanctions on its energy system were eased, it could help prevent fuel prices from rising if Trump cracks down on oil exports from OPEC-member Iran

The United States is drawing up a plan to potentially give Russia sanctions relief as President Donald Trump seeks to restore ties with Moscow and stop the war in Ukraine, a US official and another person familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The White House has asked the State and Treasury departments to draft a list of sanctions that could be eased for US officials to discuss with Russian representatives in the coming days as part of the administration’s broad talks with Moscow on improving diplomatic and economic relations, the sources said.
The sanctions offices are now drawing up a proposal for lifting sanctions on select entities and individuals, including some Russian oligarchs, according to the sources.
So-called options papers are often drafted by officials working on sanctions, but the White House’s specific request for one in recent days underscores Trump and his advisers’ willingness to ease Russian sanctions as part of a potential deal with Moscow.
It was not immediately clear what Washington could specifically seek in return for any sanctions relief.
Russia is one of the world’s biggest oil producers and if US sanctions on its energy system were eased, it could help prevent fuel prices from rising if Trump cracks down on oil exports from OPEC-member Iran.
The White House, the State Department, the Treasury Department and the Russian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Kremlin last year described relations as “below zero” under the administration of Joe Biden, a Democrat who backed Ukraine with aid and weapons and imposed tough sanctions on Russia to punish it for its invasion in 2022.
But Trump, who has promised a quick end to the war, has upended US policy swiftly to open talks with Moscow, beginning with a phone call to Russian President Vladimir Putin on Feb. 12 that was followed by meetings between US and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia and Turkiye.
US sanctions on Russia since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine have included measures aimed at limiting revenues from the country’s huge oil and gas industry and weakening its ability to fund the war.
Western governments led by Washington imposed a $60-per-barrel price cap on Russia’s oil exports. Biden also hit Moscow with designations on Russian energy companies and vessels that shipped its oil, including Washington’s toughest-yet measures on Jan. 10 shortly before leaving office.
Trump in January threatened to ramp up sanctions on Russia if Putin was unwilling to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. But more recently, Trump administration officials have openly acknowledged the possibility of easing sanctions on Moscow.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said during a Feb. 20 interview with Bloomberg Television that Russia could win economic relief, depending on how it approached negotiations in the coming weeks. Trump told reporters on Feb. 26 that Russian sanctions could be eased “at some point.”

ECONOMIC COOPERATION
The White House asked State and Treasury officials to devise a possible sanctions relief plan before Trump last week extended a state of emergency over the situation in Ukraine, the US sources said.
The state of emergency sanctions certain assets and people involved in Russia’s war. Those measures, imposed by then-President Barack Obama’s administration, have been in place since March 2014, when Russia annexed Ukraine’s Crimea.
It is unclear which Russian sanctions the Trump administration would consider lifting first.
Trump could issue an executive order that would allow the administration to begin the process of easing some Russian sanctions, but he would also need to seek congressional approval to lift measures on certain entities, said John Smith, a partner at Morrison Foerster law firm and the former head of the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Since 2022, Russia has been able to build a wartime economy with increased military spending and industrial production. But experts say the country’s economy is vulnerable and in desperate need of Western sanctions relief.
Russia says it is open for economic cooperation. The Kremlin said last week that Russia had lots of rare earth metal deposits and was open to doing deals to develop them after Putin held out the possibility of such collaboration with the US
Any formal economic deal with Moscow would likely require the US to ease sanctions.
Trump has been seeking a minerals deal with Ukraine — home to a trove of lithium deposits and rare earth minerals — as pay back for billions of dollars in US aid. However, no deal was signed after an explosive Oval Office meeting between Trump and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday.


Egypt’s alternative to Trump’s ‘Gaza Riviera’ aims to sideline Hamas

Egypt’s alternative to Trump’s ‘Gaza Riviera’ aims to sideline Hamas
Updated 04 March 2025
Follow

Egypt’s alternative to Trump’s ‘Gaza Riviera’ aims to sideline Hamas

Egypt’s alternative to Trump’s ‘Gaza Riviera’ aims to sideline Hamas
  • The draft said the board would comprise key Arab countries, members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the United States, Britain, the European Union and its member states, and others
  • The Egyptian draft does not tackle the issue of what actions could be taken if Hamas refuses to disarm or step aside from politics

DOHA: A plan for Gaza drawn up by Egypt as a counter to US President Donald Trump’s ambition for a Middle East Riviera would sideline Hamas and replace it with interim bodies controlled by Arab, Muslim and Western states, according to a draft seen by Reuters.
The Egyptian vision for Gaza, which is due to be presented at an Arab League summit on Tuesday, does not specify whether the proposal would be implemented before or after any permanent peace deal to end the war triggered by the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks.
Trump’s plan, which envisioned clearing Gaza of its Palestinian inhabitants, appeared to back away from long-standing US Middle East policy focused on a two-state solution and sparked anger among Palestinians and Arab nations.

Palestinian children gather to receive food cooked by a charity kitchen, during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, March 3, 2025. (REUTERS)

Who will run Gaza after the conflict remains the great unanswered question in negotiations over the future of the enclave. Hamas has so far rejected the idea of any proposal being imposed on Palestinians by other states.
Cairo’s plan does not tackle critical issues such as who will foot the bill for Gaza’s reconstruction or outline any specific details around how Gaza would be governed, nor how an armed group as powerful as Hamas would be pushed aside.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Egypt's draft Gaza plan has no role for Hamas - draft proposal

• Arab states seek to counter Trump's Gaza vision

• Governance Assistance Mission would replace Hamas-run government International Stabilisation Force would provide security

Under the Egyptian plan, a Governance Assistance Mission would replace the Hamas-run government in Gaza for an unspecified interim period and would be responsible for humanitarian aid and for kick-starting reconstruction of the enclave, which has been devastated by the war.
“There will be no major international funding for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Gaza if Hamas remains the dominant and armed political element on the ground controlling local governance,” a preamble outlining the draft Egyptian plan’s objectives said.

A Palestinian Hamas militant shakes hands with a child as they stand guard as people gather on the day of the handover of hostages. (REUTERS)

Details of Egypt’s proposed framework for Gaza’s future have not been previously reported.
Egypt, Jordan and Gulf Arab states have for almost a month been scrambling to formulate a diplomatic offensive to counter Trump’s plan. A number of ideas have been proposed, with Egypt’s considered the frontrunner.
Reuters was unable to determine whether Arab leaders would support the plan presented by Egypt.
The plan does not specify who would run the governance mission. It said it would, “draw on the expertise of Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere to help Gaza recover as quickly as possible.”
The draft proposal was shared with Reuters by an official involved in Gaza negotiations who wished to remain anonymous because the draft has not yet been made public.
The plan firmly rejects the US proposal for mass displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, which Arab states such as Egypt and Jordan see as a security threat.
“President Trump has been clear that Hamas cannot continue to govern Gaza,” White House National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes said when asked about Egypt’s Gaza plan and whether the US would support it.
“While the President stands by his bold vision for a post-war Gaza, he welcomes input from our Arab partners in the region. It’s clear his proposals have driven the region to come to the table rather than allow this issue to devolve into further crisis,” Hughes said.

STABILISATION FORCE
Senior Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri told Reuters the group knows of no such proposal by Egypt.
“The day after in Gaza must only be decided by the Palestinians,” he said. “Hamas rejects any attempt to impose projects or any form of non-Palestinian administration, or the presence of any foreign forces on the land of the Gaza Strip.”
The Egyptian draft does not mention future elections.
Egypt’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did the office of Israel’s prime minister, whose support for any plan is seen as vital to secure a commitment that any future reconstruction will not be destroyed again.
Palestinian Islamist group Hamas has ruled the coastal enclave since 2007. It launched the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people and started the Gaza war.
A January 19 ceasefire brought a temporary end to the fighting but the first phase of the deal expired on Saturday with no sign of an agreement to move to the second phase.
The Egyptian draft does not tackle the issue of what actions could be taken if Hamas refuses to disarm or step aside from politics.
The proposal envisions an International Stabilization Force drawn primarily from Arab states that would take over the role of providing security from the militant group, with the eventual establishment of a new local police force.
Both security and governance bodies would be “arranged, guided and supervised” by a steering board. The draft said the board would comprise key Arab countries, members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the United States, Britain, the European Union and its member states, and others.
The plan does not detail a central governing role for the Palestinian Authority (PA), which opinion polls show has little support among Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
A Palestinian official told Reuters that, like the West Bank, Gaza falls under the PA’s jurisdiction — and it must be run by Palestinians.
“We agreed with the Egyptians on a committee made of Palestinian experts that will help the Palestinian Authority in running the Gaza Strip for six months. The committee is made of Palestinian experts and coordinates with the PA, and doesn’t answer to non-Palestinian bodies,” said the official, who asked not to be named for sensitivity.

RECONSTRUCTION BILL
Since Hamas drove the Palestinian Authority out of Gaza after a brief civil war in 2007, it has crushed all opposition there. Supported by Iran, it built an extensive security apparatus and military organization based around a vast network of tunnels — much of which Israel says it has now destroyed.
The plan does not say who would pay to rebuild Gaza, a bill estimated by the UN at more than $53 billion. Two sources have told Reuters that Gulf and Arab states would need to commit at least $20 billion in the initial phase of reconstruction.
Egypt’s proposal envisions that states on the steering board could establish a fund to support the interim governing body and arrange donor conferences to seek contributions for a longer-term reconstruction and development plan for Gaza.
The plan does not contain any specific financial pledges.
Oil- and gas-producing Gulf Arab states such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates could be vital sources of funding from the region.
The United Arab Emirates, for instance, sees Hamas and other militant groups as an existential threat and is unlikely to offer any funding until Hamas has been sidelined.
The foreign ministries in Qatar and the UAE and Saudi Arabia’s international media office did not immediately respond to requests for comment about Egypt’s plan, or to questions about their willingness to commit funds to rebuild Gaza.
The draft plan also calls on the steering board to coordinate with a Civil Society Advisory Board, consisting of academics, NGO leaders and other notable figures.